Many VPNs forbid this activity for technical reasons or copyright concerns. Battlefront 2 does not implement it.As already mentioned, these VPNs must first allow file sharing via Torrenting. You can already have public, managed, and private communities.Īnd it's awesome for games that implement it. That's the whole point of tying it to communities. So that only you can decide who's in the server. And as a admin you can remove random dudes who went in your vpn server. And make your own rooms, with only your friends. I think they should use the way hamachi is doing it. GameRanger has been supporting a lot of GameSpy Titles (and other games who's service has been shutdown) since 1999. Sorrry for my bad english i hope u can understand thatĪnybody can create a community, and I believe you can have private communitites, or communities that require membership. If u do this via communtity there are a lot of security questions to fix because a community can have so many members and maybe u dont know some of them and do u want people you dont know sniffing around your computer / Files?Īs i said above this is a great idea but in my opinion its something to add to the Friends system and not to communitys I want to add Friend 1,3,5,6 but i dont want 2,4 to be able to connect to my computer. I agree to the vpn idea but i think you should be able to choose who to connect to 'your' vpn and who not so that this is an addition to the friend List for example:

and if anybody can do something like this, its valve. I think this could breathe life back into a lot of old games. each community can have one or more group. Steam could do this but in a much better way. you in created a virtual network could join and play games on.games that only had a lan mode. steam can solve this.Ĭonsider hamachi, which was great software until it got bought out by logmein. Originally posted by PnP Bios:with gamespy going the way of the dinosaur, a lot of great titles are going to be unplayable except for single player or lan.

P2p vpns